(Edited December 2nd with the addition of this paragraph.)
Just to be clear, as it may not have not been from my original post. I do not believe Title IX caused the loss of so many Gymnastics programs. Many programs were cut for economics as opposed to Title IX compliance. This is not a piece critical of Title IX. It discusses some of the things that have gone in recently that may involve it (or may not) but I am not arguing that Title IX led to the decline in gymnastics programs.
It may seem trivial to worry about sports and maybe it is to some degree. Compared to all the problems of the world, sports is a luxury. But on the other hand, we’re put here on this earth to live, and once we get through with working and doing what we have to, to survive, isn’t the point of surviving to enjoy things like sports, or any other interests? If there is nothing left to enjoy, there isn’t much to live for one would think.
To that end I am often worried about if Gymnastics will survive. High school programs are cutting the sport, colleges have been cutting the sport, and although over 70 programs remain at the college level and there are a ton of club gymnasts, things like the economic upheaval may hurt a sport already facing questions about whether it is in decline or not.
I live in the Northeast which has seen numerous college teams cut within the past few years and even more across my lifetime. One of my alma maters, the University of Connecticut, cut its program in the mid eighties, it’s rival from across the stateline, UMASS, cut their team in 2000 or around then, and another state school URI, cut their program just last year to make way for lacrosse, though the economy actually resulted in lacrosse being shelved and swimming being axed as well at URI so in the end the gymnastics team was sacrificed not for one team but just for money. At SCSU which still has a women’s program, the men’s program was disbanded despite the fact that the field house sits on a road named after a male olympic gymnast. (In fairness to SCSU I’m not as familiar with the reasons for the shuttering of the program. I have read up on the other closings though. I’m not critical of SCSU just noting the loss of the program in the overall context.) One of URI’s opponents, James Madison, had both gymnastics teams cut among 10 that were dismantled. The administration claims this was due to Title IX reasons but there is now a court battle ensuing. One of SCSU’s fellow D2 teams West Chester University of Pennsylvania cut their gymnastics program but a court battle reinstated it. Brown University had a court battle over the status of their program many years ago, though the team seems to be well supported now as far as I can tell. Northeastern University and Vermont also got rid of their teams in the recent era. And this is JUST in my neck of the woods.
It is far too easy for rational and well meaning decision makers to look at gymnastics as a burden in tough economic times. On the men’s side it is especially seen as a sport in decline, due the lack of college programs and the like, and there is admittedly more interest in the women’s side then the men’s side as far as fans are concerned, and I think that can be helped. Male gymnasts have to be incredibly athletic to do what they do and they take just as many risks as the women do, I’m sure high bar has resulted in many an injury. But even on the women’s side. Gymnastics is a sport with a lot of expensive equipment, and no doubt liability issues. It is not seen as popular as the other “major” sports and is fending with sports like Lacrosse and Volleyball. Sports which I have no interest in knocking as I like them both and go to plenty of volleyball games. But theoretically it is easier for a person to join a Lacrosse or Volleyball team then to get into Gymnastics at a high level.
Now as for popularity, college teams like Georgia, Alabama, and Utah (and probably others) manage to sell out their arenas, Georgia gives Gymnastics a prominence on their website reserved for just football and basketball usually and they reaped rewards in terms of spectatorship. In this region, New Hampshire draws very well as well and there are plenty of fans that can be tapped. Though obviously there going to be issues with meets scheduled opposite each other as well as opposite USAG meets. Nonetheless if Georgia can do it, other schools can do it at all levels.
The fans that enjoy the olympics can also be drawn to these meets. There is untapped potential that may need to be reached to keep the sport alive. Otherwise it may contract to a few colleges, a few high schools, a few clubs. And as a fan I worry about that. I’m no expert but I know one thing. Gymnasts put a ton of time into what they do, and for them to have fewer options as they advance just doesn’t seem fair.